> Thus, "disagreement" comes to connote (or maybe even denote), "difference in opinion between people who don't trust each other" rather than simply "difference in opinion".
According to the way rationalists seem to define Aumann agreement, this isn't right; we might trust one another but still have radically different priors.
> Thus, "disagreement" comes to connote (or maybe even denote), "difference in opinion between people who don't trust each other" rather than simply "difference in opinion".
According to the way rationalists seem to define Aumann agreement, this isn't right; we might trust one another but still have radically different priors.